Here they are in the message body for those on listservs that strip 
attachments. The first two are replacements. The second two are 
additions of a sentence, the first of which is surrounded by square 
brackets.
______

*Juries*
We support reforms to enable juries to more effectively protect rights 
from official misconduct and abuse.
Juries
A. Trial Juries
Issue: Current judicial practice has severely restricted the ability of 
juries to protect rights of parties. In criminal cases, defendants are 
being charged with offenses not authorized by a statute or a 
constitution, or not applicable to the facts of the case. Defense 
counsel are threatened with sanctions or disbarment for attempting to 
make certain arguments, or present those arguments to the jury, and many 
are appointed by the court and may not represent the rights of the accused..
 
 Principle: Juries should be fully informed of the legal issues in a 
case, including those offered by intervenors or amici curiae.
 
 Solutions: In all cases to which the government is a party or has an 
interest, it shall be a reversible error:
1.      For a bench to fail to inform, or impede the parties or their 
attorneys from informing, the jurors of their common law duty to review 
the legal decisions of the bench, as well as judge the facts, in 
reaching a general verdict, and to acquit a criminal defendant, or to 
find against the government in a civil trial, whenever they deem the 
charge or statute to be unconstitutional, unjust or oppressive.
2.      For a bench to impede making arguments on motions and pleadings 
in the presence of the jury, providing the jury with copies of all 
motions and pleadings, and having access to an adequate law library.
3.      For a bench to impede the presentation of argument or evidence 
of official misconduct that may infringe on the rights of the parties.
4.      For a bench to impose sanctions for making allegedly "frivolous" 
arguments.
5.      For a bench to exclude from jury service any person on the basis 
of his or her opinions on issues of law.
Transitional Actions:
1.      Require all issues of law to be argued in the presence of the jury.
2.      End the practice in capital cases of excluding jurors who are 
opposed to the death penalty (referred to as "death qualification"), 
which denies capital defendants the right to a trial before a jury 
representative of community values.
B. Grand juries
Issue: Grand juries in many jurisdictions are presented too many bills 
of indictment to do justice to each, preventing them from investigating 
complaints of official misconduct, and they too often function as rubber 
stamps for public prosecutors, who often impede access of private 
persons to bring complaints to the grand jury.
Principle: Grand juries must function independent bodies, to not only 
screen complaints and authorize prosecutions, but to supervise the 
actions of officials.
Solutions:
1.      Establish grand juries for smaller jurisdictions, probably less 
than 30,000 people, as required to enable them to devote an average of 
at least four hours to each bill of indictment, and at least half their 
time to investigating official actions.
2.      Prevent appointment of biased persons by drawing the members by 
a random process from the community.
3.      Remove impediments to access by private parties.
4.      Inform grand jurors of their power to exclude any person, 
including public prosecutors, from their sessions.
5.      Require grand juries, on bills of indictment, to find not only 
sufficiency of evidence but constitutionality of the charge and 
jurisdiction of the court.
6.      Remove impediments to private criminal prosecutions, by allowing 
grand juries to appoint private criminal prosecutors by returning bills 
of indictment to them instead of to a public prosecutor.
Transitional Action:
1.      Provide grand jury manuals covering all the above points to all 
grand juries.
2.      Repeal any statute or judicial rule that impedes private 
criminal prosecutions.

______

*Sovereign and Official Immunity*
We favor an immediate end to the current practices of using the 
doctrines of "sovereign immunity" and "official immunity" to prevent 
holding the state or officials accountable for their actions.

 
Issue: The government is often invoking the doctrine of "sovereign 
immunity" not just to require that money judgments be paid only out of 
funds appropriated for that purpose, but to prevent trials from being 
conducted. It is also invoking the doctrine of absolute or qualified 
"official immunity" to prevent officials from being sued when there is a 
question of whether his actions were authorized by law. Federal courts 
often seize jurisdiction of state criminal cases against federal agents 
and summarily dismiss them because the agent was "on duty" even if the 
specific actions were unlawful.

Principle: Individuals must have legal standing to seek remedies for 
violation of public rights without having suffered personal injury, 
including for declaratory and injunctive relief, and for writs of habeas 
corpus, quo warranto, and other common law writs, in the name of the people.

Solutions: Establish the interpretation of the Ninth Amendment to 
recognize the right to a legal presumption of non-authority, and 
standing of any person to petition for the common law writs in the name 
of the people.

Transitional Action:

Submit all questions whether a state or federal court has jurisdiction 
to a grand jury.
Submit all questions of whether an official was acting with the 
authority of law to a jury.

______

*The Right to Privacy*
The individual's rights to privacy, property, and to speak or not to 
speak should not be infringed by the government.

 
The Right to Privacy
The Issue: Privacy protections have been eroded gradually over many 
years. The Social Security Number has become a universal ID number, 
causing rampant and massive identity theft. Government routinely keeps 
records on the bank accounts, travel plans, and spending habits of 
law-abiding civilians, for no other reason than they "might" commit a 
crime in the future.

The Principle: The individual's right to privacy, property, and right to 
speak or not to speak should not be infringed by the government. The 
government should not use electronic or other means of covert 
surveillance of an individual's actions or private property without the 
consent of the owner or occupant. Correspondence, bank and other 
financial transactions and records, doctors' and lawyers' 
communications, employment records, and the like should not be open to 
review by government without the consent of all parties involved in 
those actions.

Private contractual arrangements, including labor contracts, must be 
founded on mutual consent and agreement in a society that upholds 
freedom of association. On the other hand, we oppose any use of such 
screening by government or regulations requiring government contractors 
to impose any such screening.

Solutions: We support the protections provided by the Fourth Amendment 
and oppose any government use of search warrants to examine or seize 
materials belonging to innocent third parties. We oppose all 
restrictions and regulations on the private development, sale, and use 
of encryption technology. We specifically oppose any requirement for 
disclosure of encryption methods or keys, including the government's 
proposals for so-called "key escrow" which is truly government access to 
keys, and any requirement for use of government-specified devices or 
protocols. We also oppose government classification of civilian research 
on encryption methods. If a private employer screens prospective or 
current employees via questionnaires, polygraph tests, urine tests for 
drugs, blood tests for AIDS, or other means, this is a condition of that 
employer's labor contracts. Such screening does not violate the rights 
of employees, who have the right to boycott such employers if they 
choose. We oppose the issuance by the government of an identity card, to 
be required for any purpose, such as employment, voting, or border 
crossing. We further oppose the nearly universal requirement for use of 
the Social Security Number as a personal identification code, whether by 
government agencies or by intimidation of private companies by 
governments. [We support interpretation of the Ninth Amendment to 
recognize a right to a legal presumption of nonauthority, enabling any 
person to petition in the name of the people and get a fair hearing on 
such common law writs as habeas corpus and quo warranto, to require 
official action be terminated for which authority is not proved, and 
removal of officials who lack authority, and to have such petitions be 
decided by a jury].

Transitional Action: We also oppose police roadblocks aimed at randomly, 
and without probable cause, testing drivers for intoxication and police 
practices to stop mass transit vehicles and search passengers without 
probable cause. So long as the National Census and all federal, state, 
and other government agencies' compilations of data on an individual 
continue to exist, they should be conducted only with the consent of the 
persons from whom the data is sought. We oppose government regulations 
that require employers to provide health insurance coverage for 
employees, which often encourage unnecessary intrusions by employers 
into the privacy of their employees.

______

*The War on Drugs*
Principle:
We interpret the Commerce Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause of the 
U.S. Constitution not to authorize criminal prosecutions. The Commerce 
Clause authorizes only regulation, not prohibition, of tangible 
commodities, the title and possession of which has been conveyed from a 
vendor outside a state to a buyer inside that state. It does not include 
primary production, manufacturing, possession, use, or disposal, nor the 
activities of those engaged in commerce, nor other things that might 
have a substantial effect" on commerce. The Necessary and Proper Clause 
only authorizes actions needed to make an effort authorized by a 
delegation of a power, not to get a result for which the power might be 
exercised. No amendment has been ratified authorizing present federal 
criminal drug statutes.

-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society      7793 Burnet Road #37, Austin, TX 78757
512/374-9585   www.constitution.org  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XISQkA/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to