This remarks  posted by Carol needs to be checked our further, it 
could be that the vote is not valid and all the planks 
stand.                                                                
        
  Also were the changes presented in a honest manner or a fradulent 
matter?                                                               
         
   Something else                                               
      Tony Wall who was a delegated posted on the TNLP board that 
most of the planks lost by less than 1% of the vote, he fiqures that 
if Tennesee had sent all of its alloted 22 delegates and all had 
voted to reatin the planks,  most of the platform planks that were 
dumped would have not been. He says there was 312 delegates so if all 
have the vote and I and  3 other pro platform people had  went to 
Portland from anywhere in the country  most of the planks that were 
dumped would have reamined in tact. So it looks like it would have 
paid to go to the convention.--- In [email protected], 
Carol Moore in DC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  FYI....  see http://carolmoorereport.blogspot.com for exciting new 
> content every day just about... the revolution is coming around 
2010 so 
> start getting ready, folks... (i'll tell you why soon on the blog)
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:     [ca-liberty] Re: [Lnc-discuss] Platform deletions - 
invalid?
> Date:     Wed, 5 Jul 2006 07:49:43 -0700
> From:     M Carling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:     Scott L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC:     LNC Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, California Liberty 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], LPSF 
> Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, EBLP Discuss List 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> References:    
> 
> 
> What Mr. Selzer wrote was "The planks in the platform may still
> stand, because no motion was made to delete them. Still looking into
> it. Mark Selzer"
> 
> There was in fact such a motion made, that motion being the motion 
to
> Adopt the Agenda, which incorporated the requirement from our
> Convention Rules to vote on Platform retention.
> 
> M Carling
> Vice Chair, LPNY
> Chair, LNCC
> 
> On Jul 5, 2006, at 7:06, Scott L. wrote:
> 
>  > Mark Selzer, Southern Vice-Chair of the LP in California, sent 
out an
>  > e-mail saying that the Platform deletions last weekend might not 
take
>  > effect because no formal motion was made to delete the involved
>  > planks.
>  > I am sorry that I can't quote his message, but it is in some 
weird
>  > format that does not permit quoting.
>







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XISQkA/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to