I think that it might make a good platform for the LP, the Boston Tea 
Party or any libertarian party. I'm not saying it must be or should 
be I'm just saying I put the idea out there for thought and possible 
discussion by a group If they want.--- In 
[email protected], "Thomas L. Knapp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Terry,
> 
> > Ok, my mistake, but the Old Smallest Political quiz( not the one 
that 
> > is used now) put in a statment form with a few minor adjustments 
> > would make a great fairly short platform, 10 planks, 11 if you 
add 
> > the no national ID that is in the new quiz.
> 
> I'm not sure who you mean by "you," or to what organization you 
think
> your idea would be a good platform for.
> 
> If you're referring to me, and to the Boston Tea Party, it would be
> fruitless for me to argue with you over whether your idea is good or
> bad ... because your idea is impossible.
> 
> In setting up the initial structure, I arrogated three
> responsibilities (writing a platform, writing interim bylaws, and
> appointing interim officers) and two prerogatives (making the 
platform
> perpetual, unchangeable and enforceable within reason, and barring 
any
> amendment to that policy) to myself. Here's the relevant language:
> 
> -----
> ARTICLE 4: PLATFORM
> 
> a) The Party's platform is as follows:
> 
> The Boston Tea Party supports reducing the size, scope and power of
> government at all levels and on all issues, and opposes increasing 
the
> size, scope and power of government at any level, for any purpose.
> 
> b) Notwithstanding any other or subsequent provisions for amendment 
to
> these bylaws, the Party's platform, and the entirety of this 
article,
> shall be perpetual and unmodifiable.
> 
> c) Notwithstanding various election laws which compel the acceptance
> of candidates on a particular party's ballot line, the Party does 
not
> and shall not endorse or voluntarily materially support any 
candidate
> for election or appointment to any public office who has not 
endorsed
> the Party's platform. The National Committee shall have the 
authority
> to publicly repudiate, and if possible remove from the Party's 
ballot
> line, any candidate whose name appears on the Party's ballot line in
> any jurisdiction, who declines to endorse the platform or whose 
policy
> positions are repugnant to the platform.
> -----
> 
> Regards,
> Tom
>






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XISQkA/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to