BTW what did you do in the navy? --- Eric Dondero Rittberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's another question for ya. If I'm not an > advocate of some libertarianism, than why is it that > I spend so much of my time working for libertarian > causes? Why is it that I assisted the LP of Texas > in 2004 collecting nearly 4,000 signatures for > ballot access? Why is it that I put up 3 (!!!) out > of state LP Petitioners at my home, and shuffled > them around for months in my car, at my own expense > during the ballot drive? > > Hey, if I was a "conservative" wouldn't I want to > help out the > Constitution Party? > > > --- In [email protected], "mark robert" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I assume it is not ad hominem to elaborate on > one's degree of > > libertarianism who has just confessed it. > > > > Inconsistent libertarian = unequal rights advocate > = believes > > that some (people's) rights are more important > than others = > > anti-libertarian. > > > > In authoritarian mainstream = authoritarian = > opposite of > > libertarian. > > > > Now I can further reinforce my dondero disclaimer. > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > ************ > > {American jurors have complete Constitutional > authority to vote > > "not guilty" based on nothing more than a > disagreement with the > > case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's > instructions. > > There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" > to arrive at a > > unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your > ground, and fulfill > > its other main purpose: to counteract abusive > government and > > unjust lawsuits. > > See www.fija.org > > [Please adopt this as your own signature.] } > > > > -------------------------- > > > > > > You are correct, for I am an advocate of small 'l' > limited > > libertarianism, NOT a Big 'L' Libertarian > connected with the > > Libertarian Party. > > > > My views represent an inconsistent 'Mainstream' > libertarianism, > > not Big 'L' Libertarians who are mostly out of the > authoritarian > > Mainstream. > > > > --- In [email protected], "mark robert" > <colowe@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Readers: If you are wondering what large parts > of Eric > > Dondero's > > > posts have to do with Libertarian principles, > the answer is > > > probably "nothing". Please consider the source. > Many of his > > posts > > > are not only unrelated to libertarian > principles, they are > > > anathema, despite his frequent representation to > the contrary. > > In > > > fact, his submissions have a reputation for > getting rejected by > > > the moderator 10-25% of the time. Libertarian > philosophy and > > its > > > representatives are not always synchronous, > largely due to the > > > tolerant nature of the former. > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/3EuRwD/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
