Eric,
But that in no way proves your contention that anyone who voted
for him supported authoritarianism.
-Mark
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
----------------
No, most Libertarian Party candidates, even ones for lower level
offices like Soil & Water Board, have a great deal more
credibility
than Mr. Badnarik as candidates.
For example, I think if you polled LP candidates for office,
you'd
find it quite rare indeed for any of them not to be college
graduates. Badnarik was part of that - my guess - 10 to 20% of
LP
candidates who never graduated college.
--- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Eric,
>
> So anyone who ever voted for a libertarian candidate who had
> little chance of winning was actually promoting
> authoritarianism???
>
> -Mark
>
> PS: Readers: If you are wondering what large parts of Eric
> Dondero's posts have to do with Libertarian principles, the
> answer is probably "nothing". Please consider the source. Many
of
> his posts are not only unrelated to libertarian principles,
they
> are anathema, despite his frequent representation to the
> contrary. In fact, his submissions have a reputation for
getting
> rejected by the moderator 10-25% of the time. Libertarian
> philosophy and its representatives are not always synchronous,
> largely due to the tolerant nature of the former.
>
>
>
> ************
> {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
> "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
> case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's
instructions.
> There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at
a
> unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and
fulfill
> its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
> unjust lawsuits.
> See www.fija.org
> [Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
>
>
> --------------------------
>
>
> And if you voted for Michael Badnarik, you yourself are
> responsible
> for one of the worst Libertarian Campaigns ever conducted in
the
> 20
> year history of the Libertarian Party.
>
> Furthermore, you are responsible for promoting
authoritarianism,
> cause by making Libertarians appear to be fools by nominating a
> guy
> who had never held elective office, nor had any celebrity in
any
> other regard, not too mention never served in the Military, nor
> even
> graduated from College, you brought great discredit to the
> libertarian movement. Thus, you are a promoter of
> authoritarianism.
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
