"Anti-libertarian" in your humble opinion. I saw Michael Badnarik as the most anti-libertarian candidate the Libertarian Party ever ran.
You say, for instance, that Joe Lieberman was "anti-libertarian." I guess that's why every single Libertarian Party member that I ran into in front of CT grocery stores, not only signed my petition for Joe, but expressed how happy they were to finally be able to vote for him, cause they've always considered him to be "libertarian- leaning." But then again, what do they know. They only live in Connecticut. As we all know, in all matters, Tom Knapp knows best. --- In [email protected], "Thomas L. Knapp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Quoth Eric Dondero: > > > Yupper, it's only the philosophy part that counts to Tom Knapp. The > > activism part doesn't count for nuttin'. > > Wrong. Your activism and political credentials DO count. They count a > lot. Thing is, ALL of them count, not just the ones you want to flog > at any particular time. > > Your latest activism/political credential is working to elect an > anti-libertarian (Joe Lieberman) to public office. > > In the last election cycle, you worked to elect another > anti-libertarian (George W. Bush) to public office. > > If you work as a bank teller for 20 years, and then it comes out that > on your days off you were out robbing banks instead of working at > them, do you think you're going to be thought of as a "bank teller" or > a "bank robber?" > > Regards, > Tom Knapp > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
