How does not getting involved in a squabble between two Democrats who are NOT libertarians equal "abandon any libertarian activities at all in the Nutmeg State"?
Basically, you said 1 plus 1 equals 8,715,896,000. Try to keep the facts separate from your fantasies. See the pretty strawman dancing away in the wind... --- Eric Dondero Rittberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here's another thought on the matter. > > It'd be one thing if the Libertarian Party were > running a candidate > for US Senate in Connecticut, but they are not. In > fact, I've > recently learned that the LP barely exists in the > State; that both > the Chairman and the Vice-Chairman are only paper > officers. > > Should we just completely abandon any libertarian > activities at all > in the Nutmeg State? Just write it off as totally > hopeless? > > This is THEE MOST WATCHED POLITICAL RACE IN THE > NATION. ALL EYES > ARE TURNED TO CONNECTICUT. > > And the Libertarian Party is totally and completely > MIA!! > > Would it be so bad to get involved in the race at > some level or > another, to push the debate towards a libertarian > direction? > > I would suggest, while not backing Lieberman, maybe > a press release > attacking Lamont for attacking Lieberman's > libertarian-leaning > stances on a few issues. > > Do you all really love obscurity, that much? Is it > a case of > Celebrity-itis? You just don't want to get any > media attention? > Don't want anyone to know Libertarians exist? > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], > "thomasjefferson1743" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Well said. > > > > > > --- In [email protected], James Landrith > <jlandrith@> > wrote: > > > > > > Eric, > > > > > > Why is the responsibility of libertarians to > carry > > > water for Lieberman? Why should we pretend he > is > > > anything other than a statist? Just because > lefties > > > don't like him? Is your political belief system > > > really that shallow that anyone not liked by a > leftie > > > is automatically a libertarian? > > > > > > When he actually does become a libertarian, > please let > > > me know. I won't be holding my breath. > > > > > > Until then, he is part of the problem, and I'll > not be > > > spending my precious time sucking up to a > > > well-established Big Government Statist, just > because > > > some folks on the left don't like him. > > > > > > Eric, I am a libertarian, not an apologist for > > > statists or a > Pro-Anyone-The-Left-Opposes-atarian. > > > > > > I won't be crying when he loses, nor will I be > dancing > > > gleefully when Lamont wins. > > > > > > Neither option is a victory for liberty. > > > __________________________________________________________________ James Landrith [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 703-593-2065 * fax: 760-875-8547 AIM: jlnales * ICQ: 148600159 MSN: jlandrith * Yahoo!: jlandrith Founder, Editor and Publisher, Taking The Gloves Off - http://jameslandrith.com/ The Multiracial Activist - http://multiracial.com/ The Abolitionist Examiner - http://multiracial.com/abolitionist/ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
