I hope that you are not denying the right of freedom of association and calling that a libertarian position. Believe it or not, I really would like to see some evidence for your position, anywhere, Angola, Zimbabwe, Haiti, Harlem, Hough-Glenville (in Cleveland, for anyone who is interested.)
For life and liberty, David Macko ----- Original Message ----- From: James Landrith To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 2:38 PM Subject: RE: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The Fallacy of Open I Glad to know that you aren't endorsing the murder of adulterous wives and calling it libertarianism. :-) Now then, the so-called "bad outcomes" of miscegenation that you mentioned are not the result of miscegenation itself. Corrupt governments, oppressive societies and/or theological domination of individuality (as is the case in Haiti and Egypt) are not caused by sex and procreation outside one's so-called "race." To say otherwise is, as Thomas L. Knapp previously stated, the Know-Nothing position. There is no rational argument in favor of your position. It is all based on "we don't want to be around THOSE people." Period. Everything else you've presented as proof has been an embarrassing display of grasping at straws, illogic and false conclusions. It is time to stop pretending otherwise. __________________________________________________________ James Landrith [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 703-593-2065 * fax: 760-875-8547 AIM: jlnales * ICQ: 148600159 MSN and Yahoo! Messenger: jlandrith Taking the Gloves Off - http://www.jameslandrith.com The Multiracial Activist - http://www.multiracial.com The Abolitionist Examiner - http://www.multiracial.com/abolitionist/ __________________________________________________________ _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Macko Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 12:50 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The Fallacy of Open I I was not necessarily endorsing the idea generally. However, if I had a wife and I found her voluntarily serving the pleasure of another man, the thought just might cross my mind. Also, if I were on the jury for the trial of a man who lost his temper over such an outrage, I might well let him off. I agree with you 99%. I don't view wives as slaves either. Slaves obey through fear. Wives should obey through love. I would not even advocate government intrusion into contracts where the poor p*ssywh*pp*d male did not require his wife to serve his pleasure wherever, whenever and however he wished. Also, as I previously stated, there have been some quite good outcomes from miscegenation and it should not be outlawed, although as you noted I do think that there were a lot of bad outcomes. By the way, have you ever wondered why it is perfectly ok to want to preserve some endangered species such as whales while it brings opprobrium, insult and downright hate to want to preserve other endangered groups such as white people? I hope that this clarifies my views. For life, liberty, justice and peace, David Macko [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
