Are you saying that a marriage is a woman sumitting herself totally to the will of her husband? Don't dance around the issue Dave.
--- In [email protected], "David Macko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How can you or anyone calling him or herself a libertarian > deny a woman the right to submit herself totally to the will of > her husband if she so wishes? > It is totally illogical to recognize the right of a woman to become > a harlot, slut, old maid, manhating b*tch (so long as she does not > aggress) a 50-50 marriage partner (the current divorce rate) or a > lesbian but not recognize her right to become a wife in a traditional > marriage, even though hundreds of millions of women have chosen > this path for millennia. > If you cannot recognize the total illogic of such a position, then I > think it is futile to try to educate and enlighten you further. > > For life, liberty, justice and peace, > David Macko > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Paul > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 2:06 PM > Subject: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The Fallacy of Open I > > > Wives should OBEY? Does this mean the husband is the BOSS of the wife > and gives orders to the wife? Is the wife subservient to the husband > or are they equal partners? > > --- In [email protected], "David Macko" <dmacko@> wrote: > > > > I was not necessarily endorsing the idea generally. However, if I > had a wife > > and I found her voluntarily serving the pleasure of another man, the > thought > > just might cross my mind. Also, if I were on the jury for the trial > of a man > > who lost his temper over such an outrage, I might well let him off. > > I agree with you 99%. I don't view wives as slaves either. Slaves obey > > through fear. Wives should obey through love. I would not even advocate > > government intrusion into contracts where the poor p*ssywh*pp*d male > > did not require his wife to serve his pleasure wherever, whenever > and however > > he wished. > > Also, as I previously stated, there have been some quite good > outcomes from > > miscegenation and it should not be outlawed, although as you noted I > do think > > that there were a lot of bad outcomes. > > By the way, have you ever wondered why it is perfectly ok to want to > preserve > > some endangered species such as whales while it brings opprobrium, > insult and > > downright hate to want to preserve other endangered groups such as > white people? > > I hope that this clarifies my views. > > > > For life, liberty, justice and peace, > > David Macko > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: James Landrith > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 11:35 AM > > Subject: RE: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: > [Libertarian] Re: The Fallacy of Open I > > > > > > Wow. You think killing adulterers is a good idea? Would this be > another > > government intrusion in the bedroom, or just simple murder by her > husband > > that would be smiled upon by government? If she violates her marriage > > contract, why is murder the first thought you can come up with? > Why not > > divorce? Why not sue for damages? > > > > Why is killing women such a good idea to you? > > > > As a libertarian, I favor getting government out of the marriage > equation > > all together. No licenses. No data tracking. No interference or > referees. > > Private arbitration. The REAL libertarian solution. Further, I > don't view > > women as property, potentially subject to government sanctioned > murder by > > her husband for the crime of spreading her legs. And no, your life > boat > > scenario (always a favorite of those grasping at straws) of STDs > doesn't > > justify government sanctioned slaughter of unfaithful wives. > > > > Call me crazy, but I don't have such murderous desires or view my > wife as > > property. > > > > But then, I'm a dirty miscegenationist mongrel myself. I can't be > expected > > to know any better. Macko has the scientific "proof" to back it up > - Haiti > > and Egypt. > > > > Enough said. > > > > __________________________________________________________ > > James Landrith > > james@ > > cell: 703-593-2065 * fax: 760-875-8547 > > AIM: jlnales * ICQ: 148600159 > > MSN and Yahoo! Messenger: jlandrith > > Taking the Gloves Off - http://www.jameslandrith.com > > The Multiracial Activist - http://www.multiracial.com > > The Abolitionist Examiner - http://www.multiracial.com/abolitionist/ > > __________________________________________________________ > > > > _____ > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of David Macko > > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 11:00 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: > [Libertarian] Re: The > > Fallacy of Open I > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: David Macko > > To: Libertarian@ <mailto:Libertarian%40yahoogroups.com> > yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 10:50 AM > > Subject: Re: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: > [Libertarian] Re: The > > Fallacy of Open I > > > > You bring up a very important point for a future libertarian society. > > The government and the establishment media encourage all manner > > of "diversity". In a libertarian society, it would be most wise to > encourage > > people with diverse beliefs and behaviors not to live together. > > In the theoretical libertarian town about which we are speaking, > if half > > the population regards adultery as a crime which justifies an outraged > > husband > > to take direct action, somewhat in the manner that you would take > direct > > action against someone breaking into your house at 3:00 AM and the > other > > half regards adultery and the seduction of other men's wives as no big > > thing, > > the result will be civil war between those of you who want to kill > cuckolded > > husbands and those of us who would not condemn them for permanently > > eliminating the adulterers who had violated their rights as husbands. > > > > For life, liberty, justice and peace, > > David Macko > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
