The problem is that David believes that the state should enforce the terms of the oath/promise given. It does raise a question about the military - how can we claim that rights are inalienable and yet forcibly prevent or punish those in the military from exercising them?
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 7:12 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Libertarian] Digest Number 3320 Even in the US, many women think a woman should submit to her husband. Go to the web -- _www.Alt.com_ (http://www.Alt.com) is a starting point -- and you will find thousands of women begging to submit. You may question their motives, but they are out there. If you allow sex for sale, why not slavery for sale? Is it morally superior for a soldier to swear an oath to be submissive to the Commander-in-Chief than for a wife to swear submission to her husband? . [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
