Yes, it would be immoral for a soldiers to believe such. A soldiers duty is to protect liberties not necessarily to obey orders. Which is why Washington turned down the dictatorship offered to him during the Newburgh Crisis. He believed troops should be dedicated to a Higher Law not government's law, and encourage his troops to disobey orders. Which is why we are not a dictatorship today. Incidentally, this was echoced by judges during the Nuremberg Trials. Judges said there is a Higher Law than any government's law, and we must all obey the Higher LAw. Nazi leaders did not. So they were imprisoned and hanged.
So that may not have been a very good comparision. There's a sharp contrast to [what] a soldier should protect or be submissive to. As far as slavery, slavery is one being held in bondage. Someone who has no choice. They have no rights or option to change their mind. In my opinion that goes against every principle I believe in. However, if a husband or wife chooses to be submissive of their own free will, and can later change their mind. Personally I don't understand it, but to each his own. Regards, Phyllis Bailey --- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In a message dated 9/21/2006 6:21:28 A.M. Central Standard Time, > [email protected] writes: > > Are you saying that a marriage is a woman sumitting herself totally to > the will of her husband? Don't dance around the issue Dave. > > I thought Dave made himself very clear. It should be an option. Billions > of women, as I write, in most of the Muslim world and much of the Christian > world, believe that women should be submissive. You, and NOW, may disagree, > but a libertarian allows for freedom of religion or freedom of delusion or > whatever you want to call it. > > Even in the US, many women think a woman should submit to her husband. Go > to the web -- _www.Alt.com_ (http://www.Alt.com) is a starting point -- and > you will find thousands of women begging to submit. You may question their > motives, but they are out there. If you allow sex for sale, why not slavery > for sale? Is it morally superior for a soldier to swear an oath to be > submissive to the Commander-in-Chief than for a wife to swear submission to her > husband? > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
