Connie, its going to hell in a hand basket if it does not push the Reform the LP ers anything goes to get elected parasities out of the party.--- In [email protected], "mdcrabcakes1111" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here in Maryland, the Libertain Party thinks you can be a > Libertarian and a Green at the same time! www.kevinzeese.com > What the hell is this party doing tossing its principles out the > window??!!!???!!! > > Connie > > > > --- In [email protected], "Paul" <ptireland@> wrote: > > > > There is no "limited libertarianism" or "partial libertarianism" or > > "mostly libertarian", etc. > > > > You're a libertarian or you're not. You believe in or support the > > NAP, or you don't. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" <txliberty@> > > wrote: > > > > > > A strict reading of Merriam-Webster's definition of the > uncapitalized > > > word libertarian, could describe a possible socio-path! > > > > > > > > > > > > FROM: Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary > > > > > > > > > Main Entry: lib�er�tar�i�an > > > Pronunciation: "li-b&r-'ter-E-&n > > > Function: noun > > > > > > > > > 1 : an advocate of the doctrine of free will > > > > > > 2 a : a person who upholds the principles of absolute and > > > unrestricted liberty especially of thought and action > > > > > > b capitalized : a member of a political party advocating > libertarian > > > principles > > > > > > - libertarian adjective > > > - lib�er�tar�i�an�ism /-E-&-"ni-z&m/ noun > > > > > > at http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/libertarian > > > > > > > > > SeeAlso: Liberty > > > at http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/liberty > > > > > > MoreAt http://www.onelook.com/ > > > AndAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian > > > > > > > > > If such a 'free spirit' also commands enough material agency > (aka: > > > brute physical force power) they can become a dictator over > others > > > that don't have enough power to prevail in resisting. > > > > > > But, there may also be others in this arena with enough > countervailing > > > power to remain uncounquered. If, instead of competing for > kingship > > > (playing 'king of the mountain') they enter into a 'truce' over > such > > > physical aggression they can become an 'oligarchy' (dictatorship > by a > > > ruling elite) This reciprocity would be of course LIMITED to a > > > relative few; some Liberty & Justice for SOME > > > > > > The ancient Roman Republic was such an oligarchy; in which most > > > people were either slaves (aka: property) or otherwise NOT part > of > > > the ruling elite. Since some people and actions were EXCEPTED > from > > > the elite's reciprocity of a physical aggression truce that > otherwise > > > enabled mutually beneficial human interaction, this scenario can > be > > > considered to be an example of 'LIMITED libertarianism' > > > > > > > > > 'UNIVERSAL libertarianism' is what humanity has conceptualized > and > > > been progressing towards during the last several hundred years. > > > > > > Actually, there have been multiple arenas of 'physical aggression > > > truces' since BEFORE humanity. In any grouping of social > critters, > > > a 'truce' on physical aggression is present to the degree that > there > > > is mutual beneficial interaction within that group. For > example, in > > > the ancient Roman Republic, there was a physical aggression truce > > > among the ruling elite, others among slaves and so on. None of > this > > > is to say that these various truces were adhered to perfectly of > > > course. > > > > > > But, humanity is 'growing up' > > > > > > Libertarianism of the UNIVERSAL kind, in today's 'shrinking > world' > > > political arena is humanity's last best hope.... > > > > > > reciprocal comprehensive physical autonomy for ALL persons > > > > > > aka: Liberty & Justice for ALL > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" <txliberty@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Can you just see it.... > > > > > > > > The ideal civilizing principle > > > > that can be held in common > > > > by virtually ALL persons... > > > > > > > > It is a truce! > > > > > > > > But, it requires that to it, ALL are consistent! > > > > > > > > To the extent that there is a 'truce' on any person > > > > INITIATING, or CREDIBLY threatening to initiate, > > > > physical aggression against an innocent person > > > > or their justly held possessions.... > > > > there is 'Liberty & Justice for ALL' > > > > aka UNIVERSAL Libertarianism > > > > > > > > > > > > AlsoSee- Aggressors Promote LIMITED 'Libertarianism' > > > > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/38717 > > > > > > > > > > > > -Terry Liberty Parker > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian > > > > VoiceCall 1.512.462.1776 > > > > > > > > every Sunday 6:30pm (central) to ? > > > > I host informal disscussion > > > > to which all are welcome > > > > who want to consider ideas & issues > > > > of Liberty & Justice for ALL > > > > (aka libertarianism) > > > > > > > > in Hickory St Grill at 8th & Congress, Austin TX > > > > Look for me, MyPicAt http://profiles.yahoo.com/txliberty > > > > > > > > > >
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
