PleaseAlsoSee: MORALITY: Public, Private & Personal

at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/51800
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/51800>





-TLP






--- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so
try
> back often. Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download
> selections to your computer for replay later at your convenience and
as
> often as you want)
>
>
>
> the Fountainhead (Download ONLY)
>
<http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/FountainheadH.wmv>
> Ayn Rand's study of a brilliant architect (Gary Cooper) whose
integrity
> allows no compromise in his work. Dominique: Patricia Neal. Wynand:
> Raymond Massey. Keating: Kent Smith. Cameron: Henry Hull. Toohey:
Robert
> Douglas. Dean: Paul Stanton. Enright: Ray Collins. Directed by King
> Vidor. (1949)
> http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/FountainheadH.wmv
>
<http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/FountainheadH.wmv>
>
>
>
>
> NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest
> in getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a
> legal source if one is not otherwise given already.

>

> -Terry Liberty Parker
> AND Find More Free On-demand Playbacks On-line via
> AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
> at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "Victor Bozzo" vbozzo1@ wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Home | About | Columnists | Blog | Subscribe | Donate
> >
> >
> > Why Integrity Matters
> > by Butler Shaffer
> > by Butler Shaffer
> >
> >
> > DIGG THIS
> >
> > Two news stories arose in the same week, each illustrating the
> significance of living one's life with integrity. The first involved
> allegations that Republican Congressman Mark Foley had engaged in
> explicit sexual e-mail conversations with teen-aged male pages. The
> other informed us of the killing and wounding of a number of young
Amish
> children by a deranged man. In the mirror images of these events are
> reflected both the pathological nature of our world, as well as a
vision
> of how a society might function when men and women live with
principled
> wholeness.
> >
> > By "integrity," I mean living one's life without contradiction or
> moral confusion; being integrated - or centered - in thought and
action;
> expressing both spiritual and material values without conflict; and
> having an uncomplicated mind with which to function, creatively, in a
> complicated world.
> >
> > The reaction of the political establishment and its self-styled
> opinion leaders to the Foley matter illustrates the utter lack of
> integrity in political systems. Statists and a bamboozled public can
> recite the virtues of "peace," "freedom," "protection of life and
> property," "responsibility," and other life-sustaining qualities to be
> sustained by the state while, at the same time, engaging in wars,
> restraints on individual liberty, the killing and looting of
> individuals, and acting without being accountable for the consequences
> of their behavior.
> >
> > The state - which enjoys a legal monopoly on the use of violence -
> does nothing more than steal people's property, force them to do what
> they do not choose to do, and kill millions upon millions of persons
> whom it is convenient to its interests to destroy in wars and
genocides.
> Such perversions - far more damaging to young people and to a nation
> than are lewd e-mails - pass without criticism within the halls of
> state, academia, or media studios. That so many of us continue to see
> the political system as essential to "social order" reflects our
> intellectual and spiritual bankruptcy, as well as providing testimony
to
> the remarkable effectiveness of the state's propaganda machinery.
> >
> > The state survives on our individualized lack of integrity. For most
> of us, our thinking and emotions are in conflict; our principles are
> muddled. It is our weaknesses that keep it strong. Not wanting to
> confront the contradictions that lie within our unconscious minds,
many
> of us eagerly project our self-directed fears onto others, and demand
> their punishment, a debilitating practice upon which the state depends
> for its existence. Mr. Foley provides a vivid example of how this
trait
> corrupts all sense of integrity in both the individual and the
political
> institution. As a man with an apparent penchant for sexual
conversations
> with teen-aged boys over the Internet, he was Co-Chairman of the
Missing
> and Exploited Children Caucus, and authored legislation - "Internet
> Crimes Against Children" - that may have criminalized his actions.
> >
> > The political establishment has circled the wagons against Mr.
Foley,
> treating his offense as sui generis. But his wrongs pale in comparison
> with those regularly engaged in by virtually all members of congress
and
> the executive branch: including the use of outright lies, forgeries,
and
> other forms of deceit to fabricate conflicts with other nations. On
the
> basis of such intrinsic and pervasive dishonesty, the state sends
young
> men and women off to foreign countries to kill or maim innocent
people,
> and be killed or maimed themselves. The use of torture against anyone
> the state deems "suspicious" is now widely accepted in Congress and,
> apparently, among the general public. Such dishonest and destructive
> acts continue with only token objection. But let someone direct
> lascivious e-mail messages to teenagers and the forces of
self-righteous
> indignation are loosed.
> >
> > By contrast, if there is a sizeable community of people in America
who
> live with a more centered sense of wholeness than do the Amish, I have
> not discovered it. I have long admired these people, and spend one
class
> session each year discussing them in my informal systems of order
> seminar. One year, after a lengthy description and analysis of their
> ways, one of my students asked whether it was possible for non-Amish
> people to go live with them. "Why would you want to do so?," I
inquired.
> "Do you share their religious views, or have a desire to do farm work?
> Are you prepared to live the austere lifestyle upon which they
insist?"
> >
> > My student answered "no" to these questions, acknowledging that she
> was too much of a Southern California person to make such a
fundamental
> change in how she would live. "So, what is so powerful about the Amish
> that attracts you to the possibility of living amongst them?", I
asked.
> "Is there something about the integrity of their lives that you find
so
> compelling?" I then urged my students to explore the question of
whether
> there is a way of emulating the Amish system in a major urban setting.
> >
> > It is the integrity of the Amish that attracts most of us and makes
us
> want to defend their freedom to live as they do. Over the years, state
> and federal governments have tried to force the Amish into their
> coercive systems, such as government schools, Social Security,
military
> conscription, jury duty, etc. The Amish - consistent with their
peaceful
> ways - have always refused such participation. I recall, in the
> mid-1960s, the efforts of one state school system to force Amish
> children to attend government schools. A front-page newspaper
photograph
> was about as expressive of the contrast between these two cultures as
> you could find: an armed sheriff's deputy chasing Amish children
through
> a cornfield in order to force them onto a school-bus. The scene was so
> repugnant to any sense of human decency that even most Republicans and
> Democrats insisted that the state drop its efforts. There seems to be
a
> widely-held sentiment in society - perhaps faint echoes from our dying
> inner voices - that the Amish should be left alone.
> >
> > Those who wonder if it is possible for people to live in a condition
> of anarchy need look no further than the example of the Amish. These
> people refuse to have any dealings with the state - except for the
taxes
> they are forced to pay - and respect the inviolability of one
another's
> person or property interests. Their contracts with one another are
> grounded in nothing more than mutual promises to perform. Their system
> of protection and security is found in one another, not in
institutions.
> Anyone who deviates from Amish community standards need fear no jails,
> fines, beatings, or confiscation of their property: the neighbors will
> simply refuse to deal with them - to withhold their approval - until
the
> offender reforms.
> >
> > To the Amish, their work - particularly as farmers and carpenters -
is
> the worldly expression of their religious views. Unlike many of the
rest
> of us - whose divisive separation from our work is reflected in
negative
> bumper-stickers - the Amish find wholeness in their labors. Nor do the
> Amish regard technology as an "evil"; they resist bringing anything
into
> their communities that will make them dependent on the outside world.
> Thus, the automobile is not looked upon as the "work of the devil,"
but
> as a tool which, if brought into their lives, will make them dependent
> upon tire and parts manufacturers, oil companies, and the suppliers of
> other auto necessities, the net effect of which would be to destroy
> their system.
> >
> > The Amish community provides its members no more guarantees of
> protection from hostile elements than does the dominant political
> structure in America. Not unlike our experiences on 9/11, the Amish
> world was terribly disrupted by the intrusion of a destructive force
> from the outside. Though the innocent victims were at work in a humble
> schoolhouse rather than towering skyscrapers, the Amish shared with
> others the painful consequences of disturbed men from a deranged world
> who could find only in their suicidal attacks the most effective
> expression of their conflict-ridden madness.
> >
> > I doubt, however, that members of the Amish community will respond
to
> the slaughter of their children in the same way most Americans reacted
> to 9/11. Even with the holes ripped into the fabric of their culture,
> the Amish will be able to transcend these horrible events without
> sacrificing the integrity upon which their lives are founded. They
will
> not put aside the principled nature of their society, but will find
> comfort and energy within it. They have already demonstrated this.
> >
> > But for those of us who still struggle with the meaning and effects
of
> 9/11, and who do so on the basis of principles and practices that are
a
> mass of confusion, conflict, and contradiction, our responses have
> proven consistent with the normally neurotic - and often psychotic -
> foundations upon which our social systems rest. Our alleged principles
> and values - which have long found expression only as empty
abstractions
> rather than integrated into our sense of being - were among the first
> unwanted cargo to be thrown overboard, lest they prove a hindrance to
> the onrushing sea of fear and doubt in which we found ourselves. We
> eagerly jettisoned our compasses as well, allowing the politically
> ambitious to chart new directions for us, and obeying their urgings to
> "stay the course" to wholly unknown destinations.
> >
> > The Amish will survive their pain, bruises, and broken hearts, but
> they will do so intact. Their values will sustain them, while ours
have
> been lost in the darkness in which we live our lives. Such are the
> pragmatic, real-world, "bottom line" contrasts - and consequences -
> between living with and without integrity.
> >
> > Perhaps my seminar student was on the right track when she asked
> whether it was possible to live in such a community as the Amish
enjoy.
> >
> > October 10, 2006
> >
> > Butler Shaffer [send him e-mail] teaches at the Southwestern
> University School of Law. He is the author of Calculated Chaos:
> Institutional Threats to Peace and Human Survival.
> >
> > Copyright © 2006 LewRockwell.com
> >
> > Butler Shaffer Archives
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Back to LewRockwell.com Home Page
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to