Vic, You might want to first define your term: "3rd party defence".
-Mark +++++++++++++++ ma ni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Vic, > > Surely, with your first sentence, you are "kidding" kid. And your > second sentence seems to reveal your confusion over term > definitions. Are you equating "unilateral pacifism" with the "non > aggression principle"? Again, you seem to think the NAP rules out > self defense. It does not. why does it rule out 3rd party defence? Vic ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
