Vic, Your seriously anti-libertarian / aggression-advocating comments beg me to repeat the question: Which pro-libertarian positions do you endorse and why? (I assume you endorse SOME or you would not be here.) If you could just name one, I could probably show that your support for it is based in the non-aggression principle - and that your support for military aggression is inconsistent.
-Mark ++++++++++++++++++ Terry L Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Vic, if you want clear answers you must ask clear questions :) > > If a person knowingly, and of their own free will, gets drunk or > impairs their own facilities, they are still responsible for their > own actions. Free moral agency arises from the conscious volition of > a person. Each person's inalienable right to individual self- > ownership is always inseperable from their responsiblity to respect > that of other persons. doesnt that presume you are at all times in the clearest state of mind with a clear undestanding of what is going on? and further doesnt that only work when both side have the best of intentions? what happens when one side has bad intentions and will use whatever means to get their aim, that seems to be ok provided that person uses no violence or threat of violences. Vic ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
