How many Libertarians were killed on 9-11? Zero?
On 11/19/06, Joseph Blancett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am not sure why you want me to tie anything in for you. I presented > the literature. You decide what it means to you and how you may practice its > tenants in your life. The tenant's of free will. It is a very simple > concept, although, it has become corrupt. > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: ma ni <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <statonberg%40comcast.net>> > To: [email protected] <Libertarian%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 9:08:53 AM > Subject: RE: [Libertarian] We are Everywhere > > Joe, > > Although the article "Might Is Right" had some elements > aggression, it also had some elements of libertarianism > ("question everything", etc); but I can't tell if this article > has much of anything to do with libertarianism. Could you tie it > in for us? > > -Mark > > ++++++++++++ +++ > > I also agree with this completely. Read if you want to lol. > > THE WORLD'S MOST POWERFUL RELIGION > by Anton Szandor LaVey > Religion is the most important thing in a person's life. If > electric trains are the most pervasive thing in one's life, that > is his religion. Anything can be a religion if it means a lot. If > your present religion isn't the most important thing in your > life, then skip it. Find whatever impels you most and make that > your religion. > Religions are easy to invent. Most traditional religions have > little or nothing to do with reality, are dependent on > obfuscation, interpretation, guilt, and unreasoning faith-some > more than others. Since Satanism is essentially a religion of the > self, it holds that the individual and his personal needs comes > first. If that means playing with trains or spike-heeled shoes or > singing in the bathtub, those are its sacraments and devotions. > Taking inventory of old comic books is counting beads on a > rosary, each book being a station of the cross. > Before I codified Satanism, thus enabling me to integrate > everything of a personal meaning into a suitable forum, I first > considered the religion of Dogism. The belief system made sense, > but was too limiting. Dogism holds that if you can't eat it, and > you can't fuck it; piss on it. Much as I respect dogs and their > gods, I could relate more to Catism, the principle religion of > cats. The Five Commandments of Catism are: > (1) Don't run, if you can walk. > (2) Don't walk, if you can stand. > (3) Don't stand, if you can sit. > (4) Don't sit, if you can lie down, and > (5) Don't stay awake, if you can take a nap. > Catism counsels: "He who sleeps the day away / lives to sleep > another day," or, "Respect the friend who brings your food, for > he has been your choice / Or go and catch it for yourself, and > have a louder voice," and other such homilies. > Freud's "pleasure principle" should be known to be the highest > motivator for any religion. The significance of any fetish is a > yardstick for its priority. When a fetish transcends all else, > including survival needs, religious fanaticism is the result. > When the audio equipment takes priority over the music, the way > the music sounds is more important than the sound of the music. > The act of falling in love can be more important than one's > choice of a mate. If the size of a screen is more important than > what's on it and the latest hardware and software eclipses the > quality of the product entered-fetishism is the result. > All activity that consumes, therefore, should be recognized as > being both religious and fetishistic. A Satanist whose hobby or > fetish is Satanism per se, is no more of a Satanist than one who, > realizing the indulgence advocated by Satanism, accepts the Name. > The difference between the man or woman who's a practicing > Satanist, from an identity Satanist is that the practicing > Satanist looks at the picture, while the identity Satanist > studies the frame. > Those who disparage and belittle the Church of Satan to an > obsessive degree reveal their fetish. In reality and practice, by > their consuming interest, they reveal their true religion to > be-the Church of Satan. Otherwise, they would turn on their heel, > walk away, and refuse to subject themselves to that which they > need not. Clearly, they need us. We don't need them. > Never underestimate the sexual corollaries to fetishism/religion. > It's too easy (and convenient) to dismiss covert arousal. Just as > there have been foot fetishists who work in shoe stores, there > are masturbationist writers and artists who have nothing to say > and write nothing worth reading. Their output amounts to one > stroke or rub per line of type, using their typewriters or > computers as sex toys. This can lead to sexual dependency upon > the computer. Far-fetched? Things have changed since monks > illuminated manuscripts and suffered ecstasies. > Varieties of religious experience can be as interesting as > varieties of fetishism. Though there may be many kinds, overall, > each disciple has his or her rigid set of preferred and > obligatory devotions. Each has personal words of power as a > result of distillation. All roads lead to Rome for the serious > practitioner. It is Spare's principle of reduction, Pavlov's > bell. The devout Catholic crosses himself and murmurs "Saints > preserve us." The Pentecostal shouts "Hallelujah! " The Jew says > "Mazeltov." A more potent manifestation is possible, when one > considers the true nature of religion. They might instead say: "I > need a drink," "My niece with the fine ass...," "Is she a > disciplinarian? " Every fetishist/religioni st has sacred > buzzwords: "tickle," "Cherry '65 Mustang," "stinky socks," and > millions more. Sexual fetishes are probably the most epicurean > preference of the human animal. The smallest detail is of great > significance and there > is little margin for error. In fact, there is less room for > deviance in deviance, than in any other human endeavor. > If certain words and phrases keep reappearing, it's because > they're never tiresome, always fresh. Uncle Louies favorite > musical composition may be the same old tune to others, but to > Uncle Louie, it improves with age - which is more than can be > said for Uncle Louie. It is his Ave Maria. > Satanism is the only religion which serves to encourage and > enhance one's individual preferences, so long as there is > admission of those needs. Thus, one's personal and indelible > religion (the picture) is integrated into a perfect frame. It's a > celebration of individuality without hypocrisy, of solidarity > without mindlessness, of objective subjectivity. There need be no > deviation from these principles. They should summarily negate > internecine strife and bickering. Any attempts at Satanic > "reformation" should be seen for what they are: creating problems > where none exist. There should be no place in any religion for > reformers whose very religion is the fetish of reformation. There > is even a place and title for compulsive dissidents, and if they > can wear the mantle, they are welcome. They would delude > themselves to be revolutionaries. In our camp, they are called > "House Masochists." www.churchofsatan. com www.churchofsatan. tv > www.xeper.org > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
