Hopefully, the Libertarian Party would have the good sense to endorse Ron Paul 
if, by some act of God,
(which is what it will take) he were to become the Republican nominee for 
president. Among other benefits, as
you mentioned, it would stiffen the philosophical spine of the LP.

For life and liberty,
David Macko

NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may 
have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this 
without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse nor 
protection save to call for the impeachment of the current President.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Susan Hogarth 
  To: [email protected] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 11:55 AM
  Subject: [Libertarian] Ron Paul: a Good Thing for the libertarian movement 
and the Libertarian Party


  I'm rarely surprised by the actions of politicians any more, but I
  admit to being nearly stunned last night when I went to stop my phone
  from persistently beeping and realized the message it was trying to
  get me to read was that Ron Paul was considering a presidential bid -
  as a Republican.

  I was at a Wake County Libertarian Party meeting when I glanced at my
  phone for that message, which I think can only be considered irony.
  Ron Paul is probably the person I can most directly give the credit
  (or blame, if you like) to for my presence at that meeting. His
  presidential race in '88 took him to some pretty strange and wild
  places, including somewhere in western Kansas where an unfocused young
  farm wife (that would be me!) first heard real live people speaking
  political sense and from that moment on considered herself a
  Libertarian (not a very good one for a long time, but that's another
  story).

  Naturally I shared the news with the folks at the meeting, and it was
  right then - with the war drums of Bush's escalation beating and the
  still-stunned sense of seeing in my own life the war madness I'd only
  heard and read about - that the perfect description of Paul's
  candidacy came to mind: Paul is the Republican Dennis Kucinich. That
  was a happy thought, as it seems as if the Republican Party has
  suffered from not having a 'conscience candidate'. His bid, along with
  that of other limited-government Republicans who are finally rising in
  response to the Bush threat, can only be good for the Republican
  Party.

  But what does Paul's bid mean for the Libertarian Party, and more
  importantly, for the freedom movement? For the movement as a whole the
  answer is very clear: having someone stand up and say the things Ron
  Paul will say to the Republican Party and the people of America will
  only grow people's understanding of freedom and its potential - as it
  did for me back in '88. That's an unqualified good.

  And for the Libertarian Party? Again, I see only good news in a Ron
  Paul candidacy - even if he is running as a Republican, and perhaps
  because he is running as a Republican. When Paul stirs a love of, and
  a longing for, justice and freedom in the hearts of those who listen
  to him, many will find that the Republican Party will never be serious
  about freedom, preferring to struggle for power instead. Many of these
  folks will - because of Paul's candidacy - have heard about the
  Libertarian Party for the first time. After the presidential race,
  they will seek us out. It is vital to the success of our movement and
  its goals that when they come to the Libertarian Party it catches
  their inspiration rather than quashes it. We cannot disappoint these
  new idealistic folks with nonsense about new taxes and replacement
  taxes and regulating drugs and regulating travel and regulating ...
  freedom. They will be leaving the Republican Party precisely because
  that's the sort of talk they got there. When I joined the Libertarian
  Party, I still had many very un-libertarian ideas, and kind,
  intelligent, and more-or-less patient folk in the Party helped me to
  learn to think consistently about freedom. They did not try to
  re-orient the Libertarian Party to center around my muddled
  understanding, but helped me to really understand freedom and its
  implications.

  The Libertarian Party must position itself to take a new wave of
  idealism created by Paul's candidacy and offer the people whose hearts
  and minds he will surely stir a crystal clear vision of real freedom
  and how it can work in America. I want to be here - and I want other
  Libertarian Party folks to be here with me - to welcome them home
  properly.

  --
  Susan Hogarth
  http://www.lpradicals.org


   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to