I don't think he was the best person for the job. I think his
commerical interest had a lot to do with him back the Constitution to
replace the Articles Of Confederation--- In
[email protected], "David Macko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After all, suppose that it was 1788. Would you want to run against
George Washington?
>
> For life and liberty,
> David Macko
>
> NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security
Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice.
They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You
have no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of
the current President.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Julius No
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 1:22 PM
> Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Ron Paul: a Good Thing for the
libertarian movement and the Libertarian Part
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "David Macko" <dmacko@> wrote:
> >
> > The Libertarian Party could change its rule about endorsing
> candidates of other parties. Another alternative would
> > be to nominate an LP candidate who pledges to withdraw if Ron
Paul
> becomes the Republican nominee. This would also
> > be determined by the delegates at the LP national convention.
> >
> > For life and liberty,
> > David Macko
>
> I like that last part.
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
