--- In [email protected], Kenneth Gregg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I do not see that this was a response to any post of yours, Paul. Had > you posted on "Robin Hood"? If so, I didn't see it. > > Just Ken > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://classicalliberalism.blogspot.com > http://spencerheath.blogspot.com > http://charlestsprading.blogspot.com
According to yahoo groups, it was posted in response to my post, "foreign policy discussion." I was just wondering if there was a connection, and if so what. > goldrecordings wrote: > > > --- In [email protected] > > <mailto:Libertarian%40yahoogroups.com>, Kenneth Gregg <kgregglv@> > > wrote: > > > > > > I just watched the initial episode of BBC America's "Robin Hood". Not > > > quite the production value of "Rome", I'm sure, but, ah, to have Robin > > > o' the Shire back on screen is worth it. All the basic characters are > > > there--"Robin" is hotter, the sex is more obvious, and it's more gritty > > > than the old Canadian version with Richard Greene. The actor who plays > > > "Robin" most likely cannot handle a bow, based on the way they do the > > > camera shots. But who cares? The Norman Yoke is alive and well, and > > > the Old King will return some day! God Bless the King! > > > > > > I do wish we could get the CBC (Canadian) shows in the U.S. I > > > understand the "Little Mosque on the Prairie" is great! > > > Just Ken > > > > No idea what your response had to do with my post. > > > > Non-sequitur? > > > > -paul > > > > http://lastfreevoice.com/ <http://lastfreevoice.com/> > > http://kubby2008.com/ <http://kubby2008.com/> > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
