Look atthe inherint conflict of logic in your statements. Theire are more invitations becasue it is limited to one side? Perhaps you intended to imply that lack of compitition is akin to more invitation, and then in that logic it would be detrimental to limited goverment involvment as it would limit the players to only private intrests. Ultimately what ever your argument is, its a dead end. The problem is not the system but the abuse and to persecute a system and not abuse is to turn a blind eye to abuse outside of the persecuted system. Certainly not intentionaly, however it is the effect that such debate has on the mind in mass.
What realy blows my mind is that we live in a capitolist democracy, and you attack Marxism as inferior to this, yet you are forced to provide social welfare, a tenant of Marxism. Your capitolistic democracy is Marxist. --- In [email protected], "ma ni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are MORE invitations in communism because it only allows > the govt to engage in capitalism at the expense of the people's > rights. The system presents a green light for massive govt > "corruption"; not even technically corruption because it's PART > of the system. > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > There are no invitations, corruption crashes all parties. > > --- In [email protected], "ma ni" <statonberg@> > wrote: > > > > I agree. Systems should be judged more by the corruption and > > oppression they invite, and less by their claimed good > > intentions. > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++ >
