we dont live in capitalist democracies, we live in socialist democracies. the 
socialist
bit wanes and waxes depending on which party is in power. the capitalist
bit wears a heavy muzzle and carries a heavy burden called government
and its public service.

Vic


ma ni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Uncool, if I might make gary's point for him. Your posts are too
> incomprehensible for us to reply on topic. 
> 
> Do you have a handicap? I don't usually complain, but you have
> been posting like this for a long long time and I have noticed
> zero improvement in your spelling or grammar. It might be
> possible, but I simply don't have the time to try to figure out
> what you might be saying. sorry.
> 
> 
> ++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> 
> --- uncoolrabbit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > What realy blows my mind is that we live in a
> > capitolist democracy, 
> > and you attack Marxism as inferior to this, yet you
> > are forced to 
> > provide social welfare, a tenant of Marxism. Your
> > capitolistic 
> > democracy is Marxist. 
> 
> 
> 
> This is too hilarious to let go by. A "capitolist
> democracy" is, I suppose, a democracy having something
> to do with a capitol building, such as functioning
> only within it, or emanating from it.
> 
> And as for that tenant of Marxism, Social Welfare, was
> he the ground-floor tenant? Was he quiet? Did he pay
> his rent on time?
> 
> Your capitolistic democracy is Marxist, meaning the
> tenant lived in the basement of the capitol building?
> 
> (capitalist; tenet)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to