"The United States, nominally a constitutional republic, has a population of 
roughly 300 million people. That figure represents a rounding error in trying 
to calculate the population of China, which is a nominally Communist nation. 
Yet the US has a larger prison population than China. 

Granted, in China one can find himself thrown in prison for various ideological 
crimes that don't involve offenses against persons and property. But the same 
is true of the United States, as well, even if the specific list of such 
"offenses" is different.

Subjects of tyrannical governments are left in a state of perpetual insecurity, 
never certain how or when the "law" will change in such a way that something 
considered perfectly legal today may be regarded as a grave crime tomorrow. By 
that definition, the regime ruling the United States is at least as tyrannical 
as the one ruling China, and as we've observed, the rate of incarceration 
reflects that reality.

It is difficult to tell how many of the 2,245,189 people held in prisons and 
jails as of June 2006 (the last year for which figures were available) had been 
locked up for driving under the influence of alcohol, or for DUI-related 
probation or parole violations. And of course, drug offenders of various kinds 
are well-represented in detention facilities of all kinds: By one recent 
estimate, the imprisonment of non-violent offenders - meaning, for the most 
part, substance abusers of some variety - accounted for 77% of the growth in 
the prison population between 1978 and 1996.

Such people are in prison not because they have committed crimes that are wrong 
in themselves (mala en se), but rather because the State has banned those acts 
(mala prohibita). A century ago, drug use was not considered a crime of any 
sort - much less a felony - in most American jurisdictions. Thanks to the "war 
on drugs," it is now possible to be imprisoned for growing a non-narcotic that 
is arbitrarily banned by the same Federal Government that, a little more than a 
half-century ago, all but required its cultivation: Hemp."

http://www.lewrockwell.com/grigg/grigg-w21.html



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to