Some are present situations, while others are predictions for the future. In either case, they must be balanced against he positive effects elsewhere. If it has become too warm one place, it is now fine in another. And none of that proves a specific cause. From what I've read, if human life had never existed, the earth would still be warming now. There is a possibility that human-caused emissions are adding to it, but I am not convinced. And no one has a "solution" that passes the cost-benefit analysis test.
_____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kiddleddee Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 9:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Local Opposition to the Central State's Border Fence Posted by Anthony Gregory at January 16, 2008 06:09 PM --- In Libertarian@ <mailto:Libertarian%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com, "Bob Giramma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can you show me statements from global warming alarmists on harm already > done? The warnings I see are for events conveniently occurring in the > future. __________________________________________________________ Here is only one of thousands of links: http://www.american <http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2007/09/climate_100.html> progress.org/issues/2007/09/climate_100.html You can determine for yourself whether any of these "effects" apply specifically to you. In any case, the global warming alarmists have just as much claim to legitimate fearmongering as the anti-immigration alarmists - which is zero. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
