--- In [email protected], "Bob Giramma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Some are present situations, while others are predictions for the future. > In either case, they must be balanced against he positive effects elsewhere. > If it has become too warm one place, it is now fine in another. > > And none of that proves a specific cause. From what I've read, if human > life had never existed, the earth would still be warming now. There is a > possibility that human-caused emissions are adding to it, but I am not > convinced. > > And no one has a "solution" that passes the cost-benefit analysis test. ____________________________________________________________________
Are you speaking of the "global warming" fearmongering or the immigration fearmongering? All this stuff about "balancing" negative effects and "cost-benefit analysis". I've applied it to both the global warming and the immigration "problems" (at least in my own mind) and I find the alarmism about both to be pretty much equal amounts of socialist nonsense.
