On Jan 28, 2008 11:57 PM, Bob Giramma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  BOB: OK, I already knew Washington wasn't a great general in the
>  traditional sense. Sorry if I misled on that one. And it's also fair to
>  say I have inadequate background to comment on Rothbard's criticism if I
>  haven't read it in his own words. But given that I already knew some of
>  Washington's shortcomings, I don't see a legend to be broken. Instead, I
>  appreciate his accomplishment at taking a rag-tag army and running around
>  the countryside long enough for luck to go his way. There was no possible
>  way the colonial army was going to beat the British military in traditional
>  European-style battle.

Actually, that was the exact substance of Rothbard's critique - that
Washington hindered rather than helped the guerrilla nature of the
revolutionaries; that he tried to force this 'ragtag bunch' into a
clone of a traditional European army - with nearly disastrous results.
Basically, the war was won in *spite of*, rather than *because of*,
Washington.

Possibly an overly harsh critique, but it serves as a good
counterweight to the glossing Washington has gotten form most besotted
historians.

> Also, although he had an imperfect presidency, there
>  were many precedents set by Washington that we should celebrate even today.
>  It's not easy being first. I think the greatest thing George Washington
>  ever did was go home -- twice. Throughout most of history, military victors
>  became absolute rulers. After the war, Washington resigned his commission
>  and went home. Then, after two terms as president, he again went home, and
>  we enjoy a peaceful transition of power to this day. I guess I appreciate
>  the simple things in life.

Yes, a great deal of hay is made of this 'reluctant leader' story -
but I wonder about it. Washington was obviously a man of great
ambition, so I wonder if it would have been as easy for him to have
assumed a dictatorship as folks imagine. He wasn't THAT popular
(especially after having been president), and revolutionary ideas must
still have been very much in the air.

-- 
Susan Hogarth
http://www.colliething.com

Reply via email to