Harland Harrison wrote:
> Jon Roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>   
>> You need to meet such people.
>>     
> Please introduce me.
>   
Doesn't work that way. First you have to develop good Muslim friends who 
have contacts with a variety of other Muslims. Then you arrange to be 
present, almost invisible in the background, while they talk among 
themselves, with your friends encouraging talk in English so you can 
understand it. There are no introductions.
> But Sayyid Qutb died in 1966!  What modern reference do you have, if any? 
In that culture recency means nothing, and the writings of someone from 
1000 years ago can be more influential than today's report on El 
Arabiya. Many of them speak of the crusades as though they happened 
yesterday. The culture has a very different sense of historical time. It 
is a very different way of seeing the world. One of my best Muslim 
friends, an Egyptian lady with a college education, fluent in four 
languages, still cannot accept that the moon revolves around the Earth, 
or that Cleopatra was Greek.
> But if you really think that sexual temptation is the problem,  why is the 
> still relatively prudish US the target,  instead of Europe? 
>   
They are not reacting to the reality of how we live. They are reacting 
to our TV programs and movies. Many have trouble understanding that if 
people actually behaved like people do in such entertainments, we 
wouldn't pay to watch it. Talk to some from that background who come 
here and discover that fact.
> But if sex is the problem, is it temptation or morality? 
It is temptation. It is also a refusal to accept personal responsibility 
for managing one's own moral behavior, despite pious rhetoric to the 
contrary. If one is tempted it is the fault of the temptress, not 
oneself. If a member of one's tribe commits an act of terrorism, it is 
never his fault, or one's own fault for failing to intervene to prevent 
it. It is always the fault of the alleged offender, even if the offense 
is just existing, or failing to intervene in favor of his side of a 
dispute. A foreigner who is perceived as powerful will often be hated 
more for not siding against one's enemies than the enemies themselves 
are. In Iraq a few surveys showed that the main cause of hate toward 
Coalition Forces was not that they intervened to depose Hussein, but 
that they shamed them by doing what they feel they should have done 
themselves, and didn't.

It is important to understand the pathologies that come when a 
civilization fails, and the Muslim world is a failed civilization, with 
an intense inferiority complex. Don't think that just because they have 
many of the trappings of modernity that modernity has been accepted by 
them or guides their civic behavior. It is no accident that most of the 
refugees from Iraq are most of the competent professionals, dubbed by 
their countrymen as "seculars", and rejected as such, leaving the 
running of the country to half-civilized sectarians.

-- Jon

----------------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society      7793 Burnet Road #37, Austin, TX 78757
512/299-5001   www.constitution.org  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to