« Those Wacky CATO Protesters | LRC Blog | LRC Home | Arthur McBride Lyrics » 

August 01, 2008
To Secure These Rights?
Posted by Manuel Lora at August 1, 2008 01:38 PM

The state fails to do even the things that its supporters claim it should do: 
the protection of our rights. Take a look at this story or this one or this one 
--these abominations represent the complete collapse of the concepts of 
"justice" and "defense" and "protection." In true Orwellian fashion, justice 
now means plunder, defense means offense and protection means aggression.

To the radical libertarian, the above headlines are, while shocking, not really 
surprising. What does surprise is that many of those who claim to favor liberty 
still stop short of fully accepting the conclusion of their own premises: that 
government is inefficient and operates via aggressive means. If we claim that 
the state should not be engaged in education because the result is monstrous, 
why not, then, apply the same reasoning to other functions that the state 
performs, such as defense and protection and law and courts? We oppose state 
education, state entertainment and every other state industry but when it comes 
to police and justice and law, many --too many-- give their consent and support!

It seems to me that the classical libertarians (such as minarchists and 
constitutionalists) have made a terrible mistake. They have taken the most 
important of institutions, namely the protection of our rights, and given them 
to the monopolist. I believe that, if it were possible, it would be preferable 
to have the government take care of things like entertainment and toilets 
instead of the "slightly" more important functions of defense and law.

Ultimately, the state cannot be reformed and the political system can only do 
so much. Indeed, nothing short of the abolition of statist politics --of the 
state itself-- is acceptable to the radical libertarian. If the government 
isn't fit to be my janitor or educator, it is not fit to be my police, my 
judge, my jury, president, prosecutor or legislator.

Says Thoreau: That government is best which governs not at all; and when men 
are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have.

The freedom revolution begins with one's consent. Withdraw it. It's time.


Reddit . Digg this . Stumble It . Shout It . Add to Mixx . Discuss on Newsvine 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to