September 11, 2008
The New Deal BLOCKED the Recovery
Posted by Bill Anderson at September 11, 2008 06:27 AM

In his piece today, Lew Rockwell points out that the F/F bailout simply 
postpones the inevitable bust, but also ensures that the bust will be more 
severe in the long run than it would have been had the two faux "mortgage 
giants" been permitted to fail.

One of the things that people fail to understand is that the New Deal actually 
blocked the recovery. It perpetually stopped the necessary economic 
readjustments by trying to stop the market process of allowing factors of 
production to move to their highest-valued uses. Instead, the government (first 
with Hoover and then with Roosevelt) forced factors of production to their 
"highest-valued" political uses.

The rate of unemployment stayed quite high during the Hoover-FDR presidencies 
until after Pearl Harbor. Contrary to what we are taught in history classes and 
on the pages of the New York Times and Paul Krugman's columns, World War II did 
not "end" the Great Depression. It continued the political direction of the 
factors of production, period.

One of the important things that happened, intellectually speaking, was that 
the New Deal laid upon the economy a "progressive" purpose. That is, people 
came to see the economy as having a purpose of having low unemployment, and 
that the government was responsible for that happening.

Thus, we have the Employment Act of 1946, which directs the government to give 
us low unemployment. There is nothing in that act, or any government 
statements, that points out that the end of production in a market economy is 
consumption. Instead, the New Deal and the 1946 act declared that the "purpose" 
of an economy is to "create jobs," period.






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to