Ed,
Who said I was done with civilized debate?
I was merely pointing out that those who argue in favor of Glorified Protection
Rackets (governments) should stop pretending that they are engaging in
civilized debate.
There's nothing civilized about forcing your will onto others at gunpoint.
If there is going to be a debate then it should be about how we can best
achieve our goal of permanently weakening the foundations of this Tyranny.
---Sasan
--- In [email protected], "ejpoleii" <ejpol...@...> wrote:
>
> So. If you are done with civilized debate, when are you going to resort to
> non-violent resistance? Or violent resistance? When are you going to stop
> paying your federal income taxes? When are you going to refuse to pay sales
> tax? When are you going to drive as fast as you want on the roads? When are
> you going to sell illegal drugs? Or child pornography? Let us know how that
> goes for you.
>
> Ed$
>
> --- In [email protected], "Sasan" <sasan.sadat@> wrote:
> >
> > Person A: "I think that you should be assaulted, kidnapped and possibly
> > killed if you do not obey my plans for your future."
> >
> > Person B: "I think that you should leave me the hell alone."
> >
> > WHERE'S THE DEBATE?
> >
> > Should you expect Person B to remain calm and amicable when responding to
> > Person A's narcissistic demands for obedience?
> >
> > Does it make a difference if Person A is polite and patient when advocating
> > Person B's enslavement?
> >
> > Civilized language cannot mask the savage brutality of State violence.
> >
> > ---Sasan
> >
>
