Ed, You claim that MY post "doesn't make sense", but your small post appears to be quite potent with inconsistencies/errors: 1) You reply to tell me that you "won't reply", then proceed with more; 2) You try to make it look as though the Ayn Rand Institute is not part of the Objectivist Movement, and/or that I said they are one-and-the-same, and/or that I implied that you said they are one-and-the-same; 3) You claim the ARI does NOT follow a path of rationality, tolerance, etc.
Considering number three, I just can't get that upset about you telling me my post doesn't make sense. I guess I'm in pretty good company. Anyway...let's move away from your "non-reply" distractions, and get back to the main issue. What about your double-standard, Ed? If you choose to continue to "not-reply" (with more distractions), that's fine. We'll just wait for another anarchist post and see how you respond, and/or for your next "unexplored sole argument". ----------------------- I won't reply to your other post. It just doesn't make any sense. The only thing I want to make clear is that there is no "positive influence" of the ARI, nor of Peikoff. Thankfully, the ARI and the Objectivist movement are NOT one and the same. Certainly the ARI does NOT follow a path of rationality, tolerance, peace, and freedom. Ed$
