Quite debatable. It grants the premise of the opposition. It's the bullshit of "sue on a narrow premise".
The road to fascism is nothing but half-measures. So we took 1/2 step backwards towards liberty. It could have been a sprint. ----- Original Message ----- From: goat! To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:15 PM Subject: Re: [LibertarianEnterprise] Re: Heller decision terrible Robert D. Silvetz, M.D. wrote: > The Supremes would HAVE BEEN FORCED to rule on licensing if the attorney hadn't conceded the point. > He was just doing his job well. Goat
