At 06:15 PM 6/26/2008, you wrote:
Robert D. Silvetz, M.D. wrote:
> The Supremes would HAVE BEEN FORCED to rule on licensing if the
attorney hadn't conceded the point.
>
He was just doing his job well.
Goat
Keep in mind that this was a VERY split decision. If not given that
out, it could
very easily have gone the other way. The Nine Riders of the Bench
have a history
of making narrow decisions in these types of situations. What should give one
pause is how four people who many regard as "great legal minds"
could, given the
CLEAR history of the Founders/Framers intentions come to such a badly mistaken
conclusion.
================================================================================
Tu Ne Cede Malis
