Oh goodness, look at that: > Of course, all true Pacifists are by default Libertarians. > But only a (one hopes) tiny faction.
Gosh, that was STATED CLEARLY. And written on August 8, 2010. --- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, "Zack Bass" <zak...@...> wrote: > > > --- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Wraith <wraith@> wrote: > > > > At 03:47 AM 8/8/2010, you wrote: > > > > > >Sounds like PACIFISTS, not libertarians: > > >"... a movement that rejects the use of violence or coercion" > > ><http://www.libertopia.org/home/>http://www.libertopia.org/home/ > > > > Since Le Neil is involved, I doubt they are pacifists... ^^ I doubt > > that many of us actually like violence. But its unfortunately > > necessary in some cases of initiation. > > > > Has nothing to do with LIKING violence or not liking it. It says these folks > REJECT violence. > > Of course, all true Pacifists are by default Libertarians. But only a (one > hopes) tiny faction. > > Violence is never NECESSARY. One can always, in true Pacifist fashion, allow > the rapist full access to oneself and one's wives. > > The problem arises with the faux Pacifists. They oppose Violence so > assiduously that they propose to punish me (by Force) when I exact Vengeance. > Hypocrisy at its finest. > > A society of 100% Pacifists would be a place I would enjoy (I would be the > only non-Pacifist and would do as I please at all times). A mostly-Pacifist > place with fewer than 100% Pacifists would most likely be a hellhole ruled by > the first bloodyminded dictator or Church Lady to come across it. >
