On 19/02/10 18:22, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:12:45PM +0600, "Denis F. Latypoff"<[email protected]> wrote:Just found yet another potentially broken strict aliasing rules in ev.csame here, this is at best a nop and at worst a dangerous patch. it has no effect on any aliasing issues you might have seen (obviously, as the types are still the same).
what's the danger? why do you insist in refusing this? "at best" they reduce tons of warnings without affecting the code.what's wrong with the warnings? they add tons of noise that doesn't allow us to see clearly other warnings that can be interesting.
Regards, Alejandro Mery
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ libev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
