On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:28:03PM +0100, Luca Barbato <[email protected]>
wrote:
> > so you need to identify where the warnings originate (e..g in your
> > compiler) and then ask this question to those people who actually control
> > the code that generates such bogus warnings.
>
> Are you _sure_ those are bogus? If you are using x86 with an ancient gcc
Is there any evidence to the contrary? If yes, I would be happy to hear of
it.
> you may not see them nor experience issues, any recent gcc on any recent
> arch will scream this way and with a reason...
Making things up doesn't make them true - do you really think this will
help your credibility?
This and other compiler bugs have been discussed in the past and are even
discussed to some extent in the documentation. Why you think you need to
bring this up in this way, without presenting any new evidence and by
blatant attempts at bullshitting escapes me.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
