Marc, On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 05:10:29PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote: > If you ran the code unmodified, how did you do that? :)
See the attached script. You might need to tweak it a bit (especially the cpufreq-set call) but otherwise, it automates completely the benchmark (provided you have the expected tools installed). Please, double-check my patching of runbench just in case. > Now, since libevent does an enourmous number of pointer operations, > mutex ops, syscalls etc. per watcher setup in 2.0, I find this a bit > questionable (but it's possible). The results are available here: http://wwww.pps.jussieu.fr/~kerneis/software/files/libev-vs-libevent libevent2 is very fast, but still beaten when timeouts are involved. Regards, -- Gabriel Kerneis
bench.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
_______________________________________________ libev mailing list libev@lists.schmorp.de http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
