On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 03:58:40PM +0200, Richard Kojedzinszky
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, you are right, guys, there is no mention about this. But would
> it hurt anybody to include such short patch to have this work, or
I think it would hurt people, yes.
> only I think that it would help ev++?
I don't think it helps users to encourage them to use undocumented
functionality when documented facilities exists to achieve the same thing.
> see the commit which introduced the wrong behaviour:
The behaviour isn't wrong, whats wrong is your code.
When you wade into undocumented territory, then you should not be
surprised if you hit problems or the code changes without you being told
about it.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
