Many thanks for your replay. The problem I have is that the code changed
that way that it does not compile at all. I think it is not a functional
change, but it does not work at all.
But if it is a pain for you to place that brackets, then skip them, i will
solve it. Or, to be consistent, remove the whole dynamic_loop from the
code, as now it unusable. Even if it is undocumented.
regards,
Kojedzinszky Richard
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 03:58:40PM +0200, Richard Kojedzinszky
<[email protected]> wrote:
Ok, you are right, guys, there is no mention about this. But would
it hurt anybody to include such short patch to have this work, or
I think it would hurt people, yes.
only I think that it would help ev++?
I don't think it helps users to encourage them to use undocumented
functionality when documented facilities exists to achieve the same thing.
see the commit which introduced the wrong behaviour:
The behaviour isn't wrong, whats wrong is your code.
When you wade into undocumented territory, then you should not be
surprised if you hit problems or the code changes without you being told
about it.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
