On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 09:49:41PM +0200, Luca Barbato <[email protected]>
wrote:
> For a small project with few contributors you don't care much about
> switching from something that works for you since you don't have
> much to gain.
That is, of course, your highly subjective personal opinion.
> git is great when you have to manage lots of patches
> from a good number of people or if you are used to prepare your
> patchset locally and then push once you are happy with it.
Same thing - and I even disagree :)
> cvs (and the rest) is simply lacking those features (and niceties like
> git grep or git add -i).
And what would those features be? (No, I don't really want to know). All
you said is that you have a specific workflow - which might or might not
match what others do.
> So for all the project I start I use git because I like the features
> it provides beside being a good dvcs, for the project I use to
> contribute often I keep my work in git since it is easier for me to
> track it this way.
Thats great for you, but your git evangalism piece has of course nothing
to do with the points at hand, or libev, or this list...
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
