HI Marc On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Marc Lehmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:44:21PM +0800, "Dennis Lan (dlan)" < > [email protected]> wrote: > > this patch is floating downstream which try to add pkg-config file > > support, > > It's not clear what the advantage of such a patch would be. (or generally, > pkg-config for a library like libev). > > > It would be great if you can include in, so we can carry less ;-) > > If "you" are gentoo and you add patches like that, potentially breaking > compatibility with other distributions and upstream, then you are simply > doing it wrong. > > Note that fedora plans to rmeove the pkg-config file because it doesn't > really improve anything (and they have an ethical upstream policy). > also where do you get this info? I checked libverto (which rely on libev), they still use pkg-config .. https://fedorahosted.org/libverto/browser/libverto/configure.ac#L149 yes, you may say that's the problem of libverto.. but you know you can help here ;-) > > -- > The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content > MORPG > -----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net > ----==-- _ generation > ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann > --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected] > -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ >
_______________________________________________ libev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
