On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:48:41PM +0800, "Dennis Lan (dlan)"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> > Note that fedora plans to rmeove the pkg-config file because it doesn't
> > really improve anything (and they have an ethical upstream policy).
> >
>
> also where do you get this info?
>From the new libev package maintainer who has to deal with the situation.
> I checked libverto (which rely on libev), they still use pkg-config ..
That makes libverto a fedora-only library, requiring a special
fedora-patched libev to compile, and its not trivial to undo this.
I can't say why they did that - probably they did that just because they
assumed the fedora-packaged libev version would be the original upstream
version.
Now if that isn't the perfect argument on why including this patch in gentoo
is just wrong...
> yes, you may say that's the problem of libverto.. but you know you can help
> here ;-)
Yes, I can help here, by keeping it out of libev until there is a
demonstrated usefulness to it.
I wish there *was* a mechanism that was able to automatically give the
correct cflags and libs, but pkg-config does nothing of the sort - it just
gives you cflags and libs that are most likely not necessary, and quite
often wrong.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
