On Thu, 9 May 2013 11:19:47 -0400, Nick Mathewson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Joseph Spadavecchia <[email protected]> > wrote: > [...] >> Sounds good. Shall I make the PRNG not shared by default, or do you > want it the other way around? > > I'm indifferent, so long as user code that works today continues to work.
Just a quick update... I've finished the implementation of the per evdns_base evutil_secure_rng and the updates to the ARC4 cipher/prng code. I've not started on the the EVENT__HAVE_BSD_ARC4RANDOM code nor made any simplifications. It passes all the unit/regression tests in ./test. It might be prudent to have a code review before I go any further; sound good? Many thanks. *Joe *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to [email protected] with unsubscribe libevent-users in the body.
