On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Joseph Spadavecchia <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 9 May 2013 11:19:47 -0400, Nick Mathewson <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Joseph Spadavecchia <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> [...] >>> Sounds good. Shall I make the PRNG not shared by default, or do you >> want it the other way around? >> >> I'm indifferent, so long as user code that works today continues to work. > > Just a quick update... > > I've finished the implementation of the per evdns_base evutil_secure_rng > and the updates to the ARC4 cipher/prng code. > > I've not started on the the EVENT__HAVE_BSD_ARC4RANDOM code nor made any > simplifications. It passes all the unit/regression tests in ./test. > > It might be prudent to have a code review before I go any further; sound > good?
I think it does. If you put at a branch in a public git repository somewhere, that's the best format for me to look at. best wishes, -- Nick *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to [email protected] with unsubscribe libevent-users in the body.
