On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 04:18:19PM -0700, Niels Provos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I appreciate your insights, but your message has nothing to do with
> libevent. The make files in libevent use the -I option to provide the
> path to the header files.
Well, since you thre documentation at me before, let me just say its high
time to actually read up on what those -I switches do to various
compilers....
But then, I see you are not really interested in fixing bugs:
> I also noticed that you seem to have found several bugs in libevent.
And I keep finding more the more I look at it.
> It would be nice if you could send patches for them.
I did that for all bugs where I could identify the right solution. Most
bugs are actually fixed by the event core replacement code I wrote, for
the remaining ones I send in detailed instructions how to patch the file.
> I am a little bit dubious about some of the claims such as not being
> able to remove an event while in a callback.
Yes, that seems to be simply wrong, sorry for that. If you keep hitting
and finding bugs (or undocumented features, such as not beign able to have
multiple event watchers for most events, which is probably not a bug, but
certainly something outside of my expectation for an event loop), sometimes
one makes a mistake.
I am, however, not that thrilled anymore about contributing to libevent after
the treatment you give to me, ignoring my patches, and insulting me :(
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
Libevent-users mailing list
Libevent-users@monkey.org
http://monkey.org/mailman/listinfo/libevent-users
