On Nov 9, 2007 1:31 AM, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 12:56:31AM +0100, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > tests on OSX. In addition, all test from eventxx were working except > > > for bench.cpp, which uses a strange copy constructor, > > > > Do you have a pointer to the source? > > btw, i am fully aware that you are not the author, and not quite the right > person for bug reports, i was pointing thes eporblems out in general, not to > you specifically. Thanks for the pointers-it is getting quite late where I live right now but I had been advocating the C++ wrapper quite a bit, in addition to adapting it specially for my own project. I had been hoping there would be some consideration to integrate the wrapper and tests more closely with the rest of the existing libev(ent).
If this can be done, one "off-topic" thing to point out is that the eventxx wrapper library is "licensed" as public domain and I think clearly _intended_ for the very most liberal use possible. However, I recently discovered that in certain countries such as Japan, there is no specific copyright exemption for "public domain" and specific terminology such as "copyright free" would be required instead. Some relevant links: * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright-free * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_copyright_law It appears to me that the public domain dedication in evdns.c, if you follow the link, addresses at least part of the copyright assignment issue-at least according to the US law. I am certainly no license expert, but I think and assume the purpose of the more liberal licenses is to facilitate use in both open-source and commercial projects. CB _______________________________________________ Libevent-users mailing list Libevent-users@monkey.org http://monkeymail.org/mailman/listinfo/libevent-users
