On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:21:36AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > Just few points that come into my mind: > - better reporting for expected/got values > - better interaction for exceptions (e.g. expect/don't expect one) > - logging > - possibility to run stuff in subprocesses (which we don't use, > although I used it on something private) > - possibility to run only some of the tests, which greatly helps > debugging the failure of one > > All those thigs at least help _me_ when debugging tests, and as such > they provide value to me. > > Sure, all the above things can be done manually; what would be the > gain though, other basically rewriting oUnit?
Do you want to submit a patch to convert the assert tests to oUnit then? I'll ACK it (assuming it's correct). Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
