On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 04:49:53PM +0000, GitLab wrote: > > > Pipeline #996353812 has failed! > > Project: libnbd ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd ) > Branch: master ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commits/master ) > > Commit: 0b587f8a ( > https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commit/0b587f8a4f3e61e27985b8a3f66a3d7da45c00ef > ) > Commit Message: info: Prefer NBD_OPT_INFO when possible > > Now th... > Commit Author: Eric Blake ( https://gitlab.com/ebblake ) > > > Pipeline #996353812 ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/pipelines/996353812 > ) triggered by Eric Blake ( https://gitlab.com/ebblake ) > had 2 failed jobs. > > Job #5039934820 ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/jobs/5039934820/raw ) > > Stage: builds > Name: x86_64-fedora-rawhide-clang-prebuilt-env > Job #5039934815 ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/jobs/5039934815/raw ) > > Stage: builds > Name: x86_64-fedora-rawhide-prebuilt-env
Expected transient failures; we haven't quite finished packaging nbdkit 1.35.12 and pushing it out to rawhide. Should I do another patch that widens the version check to cover 1.35.11 in addition to 1.34.[012]? Or can we just live with this on the grounds that rawhide suffers from being bleeding edge, and it will clear up soon? -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. Virtualization: qemu.org | libguestfs.org _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list Libguestfs@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
