On Sep 4, 2007, at 6:53 PM, fdsfdsfs sdfsf wrote: > My problem is that I think it would be a little much > to expect my users to install the entire development suite, > not only libhid but also gcc etc, then expect them to know to > Configure libhid and Make libhid. It's fine for me, I am > a developer, but most people expect to just get something that > is ready
The suggestion with --prefix was meant to be done once on a developer's machine, and then you would get a .so that doesn't depend on the build directory. You might want to give it a try. > ...and since Slax doesn't carry libhid I assume 99% of distros > don't have it. Since the library is still a little rough around the edges, I'm not going to force it into any distributions - but we do have a RPM .spec file, and it is in Debian and Ubuntu. > Can I not just add the .so files to my prog? Well, > I better be trying it rather than asking I suppose... Indeed. -- Charles Lepple _______________________________________________ libhid-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/libhid-discuss
