Hello, Charles. > ^ you shouldn't need the usleep() here - all libhid calls are > currently synchronous. I use it because of errors with timeout... I think I have no other overcome:(
> The kernel version should not matter for building versus running, > because a given combination of libhid and libusb versions will use > the same kernel interfaces. > However, it could be a difference at the UHCI driver level. I would > not be surprised if the timeouts were not working correctly in the > platform-specific code. I do not understand all details but is it possible to build my prog under 2.4.31 for use without timeout problems under 2.4.25? I have the sources of 2.4.25 kernel. Best regards, Serg _______________________________________________ libhid-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/libhid-discuss http://libhid.alioth.debian.org/
