On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:27 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Another note, here, I've got a much more invasive version of this patch > which is mostly just a cleanup once we've decided if we're going to > store extra fields in the seg_info struct. It cleans up do_extracopy to > just store into those fields directly and makes a bit of that code > easier to follow, I think. Maybe it's better to save extra_start and > extra_end in that case (rather than extra_start and an extra_size)? Any > feedback would be appreciated.
I like this idea. Storing extra_vaddr and extrasz instead would replace some arithmetic with comparisons which may be better. I don't think there was a real good reason why we went with start and end. P.S. This is all post-1.1 stuff I hope? :) -- Steve Fox IBM Linux Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel
